A joint project of the Graduate School, Peabody College, and the Jean & Alexander Heard Library

Title page for ETD etd-07182016-092707


Type of Document Dissertation
Author Pereira, Frederico Batista
URN etd-07182016-092707
Title Politics as a Man’s Game? Women’s Representation, Gender Stereotypes, and Cognitive Engagement in Politics
Degree PhD
Department Political Science
Advisory Committee
Advisor Name Title
Cindy D. Kam Committee Co-Chair
Elizabeth J Zechmeister Committee Co-Chair
Jonathan Hiskey Committee Member
Mitchell A. Seligson Committee Member
Scott W. Desposato Committee Member
Keywords
  • comparative public opinion; political psychology
  • gender stereotypes
Date of Defense 2016-06-28
Availability unrestricted
Abstract
This dissertation examines how stereotypes about men and women in politics affect political outcomes such as the composition of legislatures and citizens’ cognitive engagement in politics, across different contexts. The dissertation is divided in three research papers examining the effect of individuals’ beliefs and attitudes about gender and politics on public opinion and voting behavior. The three chapters rely on different types of data, methods, and look at different countries in order to approach questions related to political preferences, cognitive engagement, and voting behavior. The first chapter argues that gender attitudes stem from more fundamental beliefs about gender relations in society, namely hostile and benevolent sexism. Based on original survey data from Brazil, the chapter uses confirmatory factor analyses in order to show that specific beliefs and attitudes about men and women in politics and society stem from those two fundamental types of orientations about gender relations. Using cross-national survey data and a survey experiment with American respondents, the second chapter argues that gendered political contexts, through both the underrepresentation of women in political institutions and cues provided by surveys’ questions, affect respondents’ performance in questions of political knowledge. The third and last empirical chapter proposes and tests a theory that accounts for how electoral rules moderate the effect of gender stereotypes on voting behavior. The main hypothesis of the chapter is that voters will be less likely to vote for female candidates when they can substitute ideologically close female candidates with similar male co-partisans. The chapter uses electoral survey data and a ballot experiment with Brazilian subjects to show how those behavioral patterns harm the electoral prospects of female candidates. The overall conclusion of the findings from the three chapters is that in order to understand public opinion and elections in a world where women increasingly occupy positions of power one must theorize and investigate what people think about gender and how that affects the choices they make.
Files
  Filename       Size       Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds) 
 
 28.8 Modem   56K Modem   ISDN (64 Kb)   ISDN (128 Kb)   Higher-speed Access 
  Pereira.pdf 1.75 Mb 00:08:06 00:04:10 00:03:38 00:01:49 00:00:09

Browse All Available ETDs by ( Author | Department )

If you have more questions or technical problems, please Contact LITS.