A joint project of the Graduate School, Peabody College, and the Jean & Alexander Heard Library

Title page for ETD etd-03192019-154607


Type of Document Dissertation
Author Frank, Hannah Jean
URN etd-03192019-154607
Title Appearance Discrimination in Criminal Court
Degree PhD
Department Law and Economics
Advisory Committee
Advisor Name Title
Jennifer B. Shinall Committee Chair
Kenworthey Bilz Committee Member
Nancy J. King Committee Member
Paige M. Skiba Committee Member
Keywords
  • racial bias
  • appearance discrimination
  • juvenile justice
  • criminal procedure
  • defendant appearance
  • criminal court
  • attire
  • defendant attire
  • defendant race
  • juvenile shackling
  • shackling
Date of Defense 2019-02-28
Availability unrestricted
Abstract
This dissertation examines the effect of various aspects of defendant appearance on criminal case outcomes. Chapter One uses an experimental vignette study to investigate the effect of defendant race on conviction rates and assigned sentence length in the previously unexplored context of trials for nonviolent property crimes. The results indicate that white defendants are convicted more often and receive higher sentences than black defendants, in part due to race-based jury nullification. However, the results also indicate that racial stereotypes disadvantaging black defendants affect both verdict and sentencing decisions.

Chapter Two uses the same experimental vignette study as Chapter One to examine the effects of defendant dress and shackling. The results indicate that, at least in the context of trials for nonviolent property crimes, defendants in prison garb are convicted more often than defendants in civilian clothing by certain subgroups of mock jurors, providing empirical support for the Supreme Court’s holding in Estelle v. Williams, 425 U.S. 501 (1976). Additionally, defendants in prison garb are sentenced to significantly longer prison terms than defendants in casual civilian attire.

Finally, Chapter Three provides the first empirical evidence on the effect of indiscriminate juvenile shackling on case outcomes. Recently, there has been a flurry of state action banning indiscriminate juvenile shackling by restricting the circumstances under which juveniles can be shackled in court. Using juvenile case data from North Carolina (where a ban on indiscriminate juvenile shackling was passed in 2007) and Tennessee (where no ban was passed until 2016) spanning 2004 to 2012, double-difference and triple-difference analyses are conducted in order to shed light on the effect of such bans. The results indicate that North Carolina’s law resulted in more favorable outcomes for juvenile defendants, including a 3–4 percentage point decrease in the probability of receiving a sentence involving detention and an equally large increase in the probability of receiving a treatment-based sentence, providing support for a nationwide ban on indiscriminate juvenile shackling.

Files
  Filename       Size       Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds) 
 
 28.8 Modem   56K Modem   ISDN (64 Kb)   ISDN (128 Kb)   Higher-speed Access 
  Frank.pdf 2.86 Mb 00:13:13 00:06:48 00:05:57 00:02:58 00:00:15

Browse All Available ETDs by ( Author | Department )

If you have more questions or technical problems, please Contact LITS.