A joint project of the Graduate School, Peabody College, and the Jean & Alexander Heard Library

Title page for ETD etd-07272007-173034


Type of Document Master's Thesis
Author Denny, Joshua C
Author's Email Address josh.denny@vanderbilt.edu
URN etd-07272007-173034
Title Evaluation of a novel terminology to categorize clinical document section headers and a related clinical note section tagger
Degree Master of Science
Department Biomedical Informatics
Advisory Committee
Advisor Name Title
Anderson Spickard, III, MD, MS Committee Chair
Kevin B. Johnson Committee Member
Randolph A. Miller Committee Member
Keywords
  • natural language processing
  • machine learning
  • naive bayes
  • clinical terminology
  • clinical documentation
  • concept identification
Date of Defense 2007-07-09
Availability unrestricted
Abstract
The aims of this project are to 1) build and evaluate a terminology that provides categorization labels, or tags, for common segments within clinical documents, and 2) to evaluate a tool to parse and label natural-language clinical documents using the terminology. Clinical documents generally contain many sections and subsections, such as “history of present illness,” “physical examination,” and “cardiovascular exam.” The author developed a section header terminology that models common section names, subsection names, and their relationships. This terminology was built using existing standardized terminologies, textbooks, and review of over 9,000 clinical notes. The section tagging tool, named SecTag, identifies terminology matches from clinical documents using a combination of linguistic, natural language processing, and machine learning techniques. The evaluation study focused on recognizing sections in 319 randomly-chosen “history and physical examination” notes that were generated during hospitalizations and outpatient visits. The overall recall and precision were 99% and 96%, respectively, over 16,036 possible sections. Recall and precision for sections not labeled in the document were 97% and 87%, respectively. The system correctly tagged 93% of the section start and end boundaries. SecTag failed to label 160 sections (1%); only 11 were headings that were absent in the terminology and which should be added to it. SecTag and its terminology are important first steps for understanding clinical notes. Future studies are needed to extend the terminology to other clinical note types and to link SecTag to a more in-depth natural language processing system.
Files
  Filename       Size       Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds) 
 
 28.8 Modem   56K Modem   ISDN (64 Kb)   ISDN (128 Kb)   Higher-speed Access 
  denny.pdf 689.21 Kb 00:03:11 00:01:38 00:01:26 00:00:43 00:00:03

Browse All Available ETDs by ( Author | Department )

If you have more questions or technical problems, please Contact LITS.