A joint project of the Graduate School, Peabody College, and the Jean & Alexander Heard Library

Title page for ETD etd-07242009-135048


Type of Document Master's Thesis
Author Leegon, Jeffrey Thomas
Author's Email Address jeffrey.leegon@vanderbilt.edu
URN etd-07242009-135048
Title A comparison of Bayesian network structure learning algorithms on emergency department ambulance diversion data
Degree Master of Science
Department Biomedical Informatics
Advisory Committee
Advisor Name Title
Dominik Aronsky Committee Chair
Cynthia Gadd Committee Member
Ian Jones Committee Member
Qingxia Chen Committee Member
Keywords
  • ED
  • diversion
  • ambulance
  • Bayesian networks
  • Bayesian Network Structure Learning
Date of Defense 2009-07-16
Availability unrestricted
Abstract
Use of Bayesian networks (BN) has increased in medicine. Traditionally, BNs have been developed by experts or from the current literature. Several applications implement "off the shelf" BN structure learning algorithms, but few implementations have been evaluated.

We compared six "off the shelf" BN structure learning algorithms and an expert-developed BN using two years of data from a curated emergency department (ED) overcrowding database. We used ED ambulance diversion as the reference standard. Eighteen variables selected from a previous study were used for prediction. BN structures were learned from a data set for predicting ED diversion one hour in advance. The data set was discretized using equal frequency and equal width discretization. Each BN structure learning algorithm developed a structure based on each data set. We used area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), negative log likelihood, and Akaike information criterion to compare the structures as they predicted ED diversion at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours in advance.

Both the training and test data sets contained >100,000 data points. The ED was on ambulance diversion 22% of the time. The machine-learned networks were complex, with >3,000 conditional probabilities, compared to the expert-developed network, with 365. Both the best performing machine-learned structure and the expert-developed network had an AUC of 0.95 predicting diversion at one hour and 0.94 predicting diversion at two hours in advance.

The machine-learned BN performed as well at the expert-developed BN. The expert-developed network was parsimonious, but required extensive user involvement.

Files
  Filename       Size       Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds) 
 
 28.8 Modem   56K Modem   ISDN (64 Kb)   ISDN (128 Kb)   Higher-speed Access 
  Leegon2009ThesisFinal.pdf 5.23 Mb 00:24:11 00:12:26 00:10:53 00:05:26 00:00:27

Browse All Available ETDs by ( Author | Department )

If you have more questions or technical problems, please Contact LITS.