A joint project of the Graduate School, Peabody College, and the Jean & Alexander Heard Library

Title page for ETD etd-03262017-232544


Type of Document Dissertation
Author Ginther, Matthew Raymond
Author's Email Address ginther@gmail.com
URN etd-03262017-232544
Title Neural and Cognitive Bases of Human Punishment Behavior
Degree PhD
Department Neuroscience
Advisory Committee
Advisor Name Title
Jeffrey Schall Committee Chair
Baxter Rogers Committee Member
David Zald Committee Member
René Marois Committee Member
Keywords
  • fMRI
  • Emotion
  • Punishment
  • Moral Outrage
Date of Defense 2017-03-24
Availability restricted
Abstract
Punishment undergirds large-scale cooperation and helps dispense criminal justice. Despite its importance, little is known about the brain mechanisms that support punishment decision-making as well as the influence of affect on these brain systems. Across four studies I explore these twin questions. Prior behavioral studies indicate that the mental state of the offender and the harm he caused are the primary factors that influence the outcome of a punishment decision. Chapter one examines how people assess the mental states of offenders, evaluate the harms they caused, and integrate those two components into a single punishment decision. Using a new design, we isolated these three processes, identifying the distinct brain systems and activities that enable each. Additional findings suggest that the amygdala plays a crucial role in mediating the interaction of mental state and harm information, whereas the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plays a crucial, final-stage role, both in integrating mental state and harm information and in selecting a suitable punishment amount. Chapter two builds on chapter one to explore the role of affective arousal in shifting the outcome of the punishment decision. Specifically, we use a subliminal cue that is known to target activation in the amygdala and assess the extent to which there may be a causal link between the amygdala and punishment decisions.

In chapters three and four I expand on the role of emotional affect in third-party punishment decision-making by parsing the specific emotional state that is associated with mediating the relationship between norm violations and punishment outcomes. Inconsistent with the popular notion that punishment decisions are based on purely cognitive reasoning, intended harmful acts elicit strong emotional reactions in third-party decision makers. While these emotional responses are now believed to affect punishment decision-making, there is much debate about what emotions may be fueling this behavior. Chapter three demonstrates that–unlike anger, contempt, and disgust–moral outrage is evoked by the integration of culpable mental state and resulting harms, and it alone mediates the relationship between this integrative process and punishment decisions. Chapter four demonstrates that moral outrage appears to be selective for third-party norm violations.

Files
  Filename       Size       Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds) 
 
 28.8 Modem   56K Modem   ISDN (64 Kb)   ISDN (128 Kb)   Higher-speed Access 
[campus] Ginther.pdf 5.27 Mb 00:24:25 00:12:33 00:10:59 00:05:29 00:00:28
[campus] indicates that a file or directory is accessible from the campus network only.

Browse All Available ETDs by ( Author | Department )

If you have more questions or technical problems, please Contact LITS.