A joint project of the Graduate School, Peabody College, and the Jean & Alexander Heard Library

Title page for ETD etd-03192015-153652


Type of Document Dissertation
Author Collins, Alyson Alexander
URN etd-03192015-153652
Title Performance Variations Across Response Formats on Reading Comprehension Assessments
Degree PhD
Department Special Education
Advisory Committee
Advisor Name Title
Donald L. Compton, Ph.D. Committee Chair
Douglas Fuchs, Ph.D. Committee Member
Lynn S. Fuchs, Ph.D. Committee Member
Marcia A. Barnes, Ph.D. Committee Member
Keywords
  • reading comprehension
  • assessment
  • listening comprehension
  • attention
  • working memory
  • word reading
Date of Defense 2015-03-09
Availability unrestricted
Abstract
Findings of recent studies suggest variations in performance across reading comprehension tests may be a product of differences among assessment dimensions (e.g., response format, genre) or child skills (e.g., Francis, Fletcher, Catts, & Tomblin, 2005; Keenan, 2013). The purpose of the current study was to investigate sources of variation in reading comprehension for three response formats (i.e., open-ended questions, multiple choice, retell) in relation to text genres and child skills. Participants included 79 fourth graders recruited from six classrooms within one elementary school. All participants read six passages (including three narrative and three expository texts) from the Qualitative Reading Inventory-Fifth Edition (QRI-5; Leslie & Caldwell, 2011) and completed a brief comprehension assessment, each of a varying response format. In addition, measures of word reading, linguistic and cognitive skills, and learning strategies were administered to each student across two 60-min testing sessions. Item-response crossed random effects models revealed statistically significant differences between open-ended and multiple-choice questions. Moreover, across the three response formats, five covariates were statistically significant predictors of reading comprehension: (a) genre, (b) listening comprehension, (c) working memory, (d) attention, and (e) word recognition. Further exploratory analyses identified three two-way interactions between: (a) Response Format (i.e., open-ended and multiple-choice questions) × Genre, (b) Response Format × Listening Comprehension, and (c) Response Format × Attention. Results of this study offer evidence to suggest the use of different response formats may lead to variations in student performance across reading comprehension tests. Given these findings, directions for future research and implications for using comprehension tests in research, policy, and practice are discussed.
Files
  Filename       Size       Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds) 
 
 28.8 Modem   56K Modem   ISDN (64 Kb)   ISDN (128 Kb)   Higher-speed Access 
  CollinsAADissertationFINAL.pdf 2.36 Mb 00:10:54 00:05:36 00:04:54 00:02:27 00:00:12

Browse All Available ETDs by ( Author | Department )

If you have more questions or technical problems, please Contact LITS.